1. Aeron-Thomas, A., Downing, A.J., Jacobs, G.D., Fletcher, J.P., Deslby, T. and Silcock, D.T. (2002) A review of road safety management and practice. Final report. Crowthorne, Transport Research Laboratory and Babtie Ross Silcock (TRL Report PR/INT216/2002)
  2. Allsop, R.E. ed (2003) Risk assessment and target setting in EU transport programmes, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
  3. Allsop, R. ed (1997) Road safety audit and safety impact assessment, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
  4. Austrian Road Safety Board (Kfv)
  5. Bliss,T. and Breen, J. (2008) Implementing the Recommendations of The World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention Country guidelines for the conduct of road safety management capacity reviews and the related specification of lead agency reforms, investment strategies and safety programs and projects, Global Road Safety Facility, World Bank, Washington.
  6. Bliss, T. (2004) Implementing the Recommendations of The World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention. Transport Note No. TN-1, The World Bank, Washington DC
  7. Breen, J. (2004) Road Safety Advocacy, BMJ 2004;328:888-890(10April)
  8. Breen, J; Howard, E; Bliss, T.(2008). Independent Review of Road Safety in Sweden, Jeanne Breen Consulting, Eric Howard and Associates, and the World Bank, Swedish Roads Administration,
  9. Broughton, J. et al (2000) The numerical context for setting national casualty reduction targets, Crowthorne, Transport Research Laboratory Ltd., TRL Report No. 382
  11. Crashtest www.crashtest.comFolksam Research, Sweden
  12. CROW
  13. Danish Road Safety Commission Denmark (2000) Every Accident is One Too Many
  14. Department for Transport (2004) Annual report 2004, United Kingdom
  15. DUMAS Project, the, Developing Urban Management and Safety
  16. Elvik, R. (2003) An overview of target-setting in Europe, Best in Europe Conference on Targeted Road Safety Programmes in the EU, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
  17. Elvik, R. (2001) Quantified road safety targets: an assessment of evaluation methodology. Oslo, Institute of Transport Economics (Report No.539).
  18. Elvik, R., Vaa, T. eds (2004) Handbook of road safety measures, Elsevier
  19. ECMT (2004), Road Safety: Implementation of the objective –50% killed by 2012,Monitoring Procedure, CEMT/CM 12, Paris
  20. EuroNCAP European New Car Assessment Programme
  21. European Commission European Road Safety Action Programme
  22. European Transport Safety Council (ETSC)
  23. ETSC European Transport Safety Council (2005) 7th Lecture Vision Zero
  24. ETSC (2004) Appendix 1. Transport Safety Organisation in public and private sectors Brussels
  25. ETSC (2003) Cost effective EU Transport Safety Measures Brussels
  26. ETSC (2003) Transport safety performance in the European Union: A Statistical Overview, European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
  27. ETSC (2001) Transport Safety Performance Indicators
  28. ETSC (1999) Police enforcement strategies to reduce traffic casualties in Europe Brussels,Work Package 9 – Town Studies, Baden
  29. Forum of European Road Safety Research Institutes
  30. Graaf, H. van de& Hoppe, R. (1992) Beleid en Politiek: een inleiding tot de beleidswetenschap en de beleidskunde
  31. INRETS, France SARTRE 1
  32. IRTAD, 2008 Press Release, 8th October, 2008
  33. Institution of Highways & Transportation Kingdom
  34. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety United States
  35. Jones, J. (2005) Effective and Efficient Road Policing in New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
  36. Koornstra, M. et al (2002) SUNflower: a comparative study of the development of road safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. Leidschendam, Dutch Institute for Road Safety Research
  37. Land Transport Safety Authority (2003) Road Safety to 2010, Wellington, New Zealand
  38. Land Transport Safety Authority (2000) Safety Directions, predicting and costing road safety outcomes Working Paper 6, Wellington, New Zealand
  39. Land Transport Safety Authority (2000) Safety Directions, estimated effects of interventions on road safety outcomes to 2010 Working Paper 7, Wellington, New Zealand
  40. Land Transport Safety Authority (2000), Road Safety Strategy 2010: A Consultation Document. National Road Safety Committee, Land Transport Safety Authority, Wellington.
  41. Land Transport Safety Authority (1998), Safety Directions: The Safety Directions Development Programme Working Paper 2, Wellington,June 1998
  42. Land Transport Safety Authority (1998), Safety Directions: Setting road safety targets, Working Paper 4, Wellington,2000
  43. Lie, A. and Tingvall, C. (2005) Government Status Report, Sweden Roads Administration, ECMT.
  44. Lie, A. and Tingvall, C. (2003) Swedish National Roads Administration, Governmental status report, Sweden Proceedings 18th Experimental Safety of Vehicles Conference
  45. Lines, C.J., Machata, K. (2000) Changing streets, protecting people: making roads safer for all. In: Proceedings of the Best in Europe Conference, Brussels, European Transport Safety Council, 2000:37 –47
  46. Machata, K., Stratil-Sauer, G., Risser, A. and Schrammel, E. (2000) Developing Urban Management and Safety (DUMAS)
  47. Maltby, C. (2003) Best Value, Local Transport Plans and Road Safety: Listening to and Learning from the Profession, PACTS
  48. Ministry of Transport, France
  49. Ministry of Transport and Communication Finland
  50. Muhlrad N, Systems de gestion de la securité routière, INRETS (2006).
  51. National Society for Road Safety Sweden
  52. OECD (2008) Towards Zero: Achieving Ambitious Road Safety Targets through a Safe System Approach.OECD, Paris
  53. OECD (2002) Road Safety: What’s the Vision? Paris
  54. OECD (1994) Targeted Road Safety Programmes, Paris
  55. OECD (1990) Integrated Urban Safety Management, Paris
  56. Peden, M., Scurfield, R., Sleet, D., Mohan, D., Hyder, A., Jarawan, E. and Mathers, C. eds (2004) World report on road traffic injury prevention Geneva, World Health Organization
  57. Racioppi, F., Eriksson, L., Tingvall, C., Villaveces, A. (2004) Preventing Road Traffic Injury: a public health perspective for EuropeWorld Health Organization
  58. Rosebud (2003) Road Safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making thematic network
  59. Rumar, K. (1999). Transport safety visions, targets and strategies; beyond 2000. 1st European Transport Safety Lecture. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels
  60. SAFETYNET (2006) Safety Performance Indicators, Work package 3 – Not yet published ERSO
  61. SAFETYNET (2005) Annual Statistical report: Building the European Road Safety Observatory, Work package 1 – Task 3 Deliverable no.2 ERSO
  62. Swedish Roads Administration (2003) Vision ZeroSectoral Report, Publication, 2004 29E, Borlange
  63. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research SWOV Knowledge base
  64. SWOV Institute for Road Safety SWOV Research Activities 27
  65. Trinca, G., Johnston, I., Campbell, B., Haight, F., Knight, P., Mackay, M., McLean, J., and Petrucelli, E. (1988) Reducing Traffic Injury the Global Challenge , Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 1988, ISBN 0 909844 20 8
  66. Tingvall, C. (1995) The Zero Vision. In: van Holst, H., Nygren, A., Thord, R., eds Transportation, traffic safety and health: the new mobility. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1995:35–57
  67. TNO, The Netherlands, Advanced Passive Safety Network
  68. Vakes:
  69. Veijalainen, T. (1999) Best in Europe Conference, ETSC Brussels
  70. Victoria's Road Safety Strategy Australia
  71. Wegman, F. (2000) Sharing responsibility: central and local government partnership, ETSC Best in Europe Conference,Brussels
  72. Wegman, F. Elsenaar, P. (1997) Sustainable solutions to improve road safety in the Netherlands. Leidschendam, Institute for Road Safety Research, 1997 (SWOV Report D–97–8)
  73. Wegman, F.C.M. et al (1994) Road safety impact assessment. Leidschendam, Institute for Road Safety Research (SWOV Report R-94-20)
© 2007 SafetyNet. All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Contact